[Psi-devel] Re: OTR-Encryption

Trejkaz trejkaz at trypticon.org
Tue Feb 8 01:06:22 PST 2005


On Tuesday 08 February 2005 15:22, Nolan Eakins wrote:
> trejkaz at trypticon.org wrote:
> | In any case, if their crypto is really any good, maybe we can try
> | implementing a "Jabberised" version of the same protocol.
> |
> | Or maybe one of the existing crypto JEPs is just as good as OTR already.
>
> Personally, I think actual E2E, RFC 3923, should be given priority.

I don't.  RFC 3923 is a piece of shit.  Nobody has even written a CPIM parser 
in any programming language, and I can't imagine the Psi project wanting to 
do such things any time in the near future.

I expect that RFC 3923 will dissolve and be replaced with something that 
_doesn't_ violate the very spirit of Jabber.

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz at trypticon.org>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/
         Jabber ID: trejkaz at jabber.zim.net.au
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/psi-devel-affinix.com/attachments/20050208/ccb00008/attachment.bin


More information about the Psi-devel-affinix.com mailing list