[Psi-devel] Re: Task#340 - Communication Between Running Psi
Instances
Norman Rasmussen
normanr at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 02:02:04 PDT 2005
AFAIK, win32 has something called NamedPipes, which function much like
unix sockets.
On 14/07/05, Trejkaz <trejkaz at trypticon.org> wrote:
> Quoting Maciek Niedzielski <machekku at miroku.uaznia.net>:
> > You cannot provide the same the same IPC interface on all platforms,
> > because different OSes have different IPC methods.
> > (I mean the interface used from "outside" of Psi)
>
> Well, there is always XML-RPC... that can be used just as easily on a local
> machine as it can over a network.
>
> But you could argue that even on the same "OS" people can't agree on the IPC
> method to use. For instance, KDE will always stick with DCOP, at least until
> D-BUS is better (which it currently isn't...)
>
> I agree that plugins are the way to go. That way the GNOME junkies can have
> their D-BUS plugin, the KDE junkies can have their DCOP plugin. And
> people who
> want a completely platform-agnostic solution can use XML-RPC. :-)
>
> When I think about it more, an XML-RPC plugin would have some even
> better/cooler
> uses. It could implement XML-RPC over Jabber inside Psi, and use the same
> remote control mechanism across a network as we use on the local machine.
>
> TX
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Psi-devel-affinix.com mailing list
> Psi-devel-affinix.com at lists.affinix.com
> http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affinix.com
>
--
- Norman Rasmussen
- Email: norman at rasmussen.co.za
- Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
More information about the Psi-devel-affinix.com
mailing list