[Psi-devel] Re: 0.10 and Qt4 Conversion (independant)
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Thu Jun 30 08:40:58 PDT 2005
Remko Troncon wrote:
>>I think we should do a MUC release before the Qt4 release. Converting to
>>Qt4 is going to be non-trivial and could take a while.
> I suspect that integrating MUC will be a lot harder than porting to Qt4.
> The Qt4 port should normally appear shortly after 0.10 is released.
Hmm, I agree with Sneakin, but then I *really* want mu-c sooner rather
mu-c has been working wonderfully for me. The only missing feature (that
I notice) is bookmarking conferences to the roster, and that's hardly
And I fear that porting to qt4, let alone distros actually having it
available, will turn out to be more complex and/or take longer than
Bad - You get pulled over for doing 90 in a school zone and you're drunk
off your ass again at three in the afternoon.
Worse - The cop is drunk too, and he's a mean drunk.
FUCK! - A mean drunk that's actually a swarm of semi-sentient
OpenPGP key id: 0x51192FF2 @ subkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 264 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/psi-devel-affinix.com/attachments/20050630/6003630b/signature.bin
More information about the Psi-devel-affinix.com