[Psi-devel] website plan

[Hal Rottenberg]

On 3/2/06, Yves Goergen <nospam.list at unclassified.de> wrote:
> Oh, iirc, the XHTML 1.0 spec says, the content type "SHOULD" be that
> xhtml thing. Does that mean, a violating site is "broken"? Or is it just
> not "behaving like it should"?

The latter.  That's probably why MS has been lax on this particular
point.  They can claim compliance.

--
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:hal at jabber.rocks.cc
http://halr9000.com