[Psi-devel] Submitting your patches

[Rafael Espíndola]

> You're right, patches should now be sent in a unified diff format,
> not darcs bundles, although if you could send them to patches at psi-
> im.org as well as to this list, it will help us :)
ok. I will try to remember that :-)

> As to the content of the patches - I haven't looked at them yet, but
> they seem to be patches to libjingle from the names,  and we're very
> keen not to fork libjingle - perhaps you could try and get these
> patches into the next version of libjingle?

The libjingle development seems to have slowed down and they are not
replying to emails :-(

The tapioca project has a svn repository with a copy of lijingle that
has some bugfixes and some nice new features (pkgconfig for example).
If upstream libjingle starts to accept patches, I am sure this will be
merge as fast as possible.

My final goal is to remove the many different copies of libjingle
present in the many projects. This will make debugging much easier for
example. In order to do that, I started to remove one layer after the
other. First port to a new ortp, then the mediastreamer. Now I am
ready to try to use an external libjingle.

The libjingle copy in the tapioca svn doesn't has the session/phone
directory. It was remove because of copyright issues (bsd code using
lgpl (now gpl) library). Now that I have ported it to use an external
mediastreamer I will try to add it back to the svn. If I can't, I will
try make the copy on psy use an external version of libjingle.

> Best,
> /K

Best Regards,
Rafael