[Psi-devel] Request for pokes
Daniel Henninger
jadestorm at nc.rr.com
Thu Oct 19 10:14:33 PDT 2006
BTW, good job folk! The previous beta of Psi crashed relentlessly on
me under OS X, but this latest beta seems to be quite stable!
I don't have any patches, but I did at one point post about a bug in
Psi that I don't think has been fixed yet. I don't see it in the bug
tracker though. The gist is, according to:
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-gateway
The response as to what the translated jid is should come back in the
jid field, not the prompt field. However, Psi is looking for the
prompt field. From what I've seen to date, most transports go with
what you all have implemented, not with what the XEP states. =) I
actually adjusted PyICQt and PyAIMt to send both the result in the
prompt field and the jid field, so it both follows the XEP, and also
follows what Psi expects. =)
No biggie though, again, great work folk! Psi has always been -the-
client I use for "real work" (development testing, kind of the
defacto 'if it works with psi, it's done right', kind of thing ;) ).
Daniel
> On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 04:48, Remko Troncon wrote:
>> If anyone still has patches he/she feels they should be included
>> in 0.11,
>> please poke me (either on the list or via IM).
>
More information about the psi-devel
mailing list