[Psi-devel] Request for pokes

[Daniel Henninger]

[of course, by the same token, if i'm reading this right, i should be  
returning a disco id of gateway/aim, not just aim.  ;D  dooh]

Daniel

On Oct 19, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Daniel Henninger wrote:

> BTW, good job folk!  The previous beta of Psi crashed relentlessly on
> me under OS X, but this latest beta seems to be quite stable!
>
> I don't have any patches, but I did at one point post about a bug in
> Psi that I don't think has been fixed yet.  I don't see it in the bug
> tracker though.  The gist is, according to:
> http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-gateway
>
> The response as to what the translated jid is should come back in the
> jid field, not the prompt field.  However, Psi is looking for the
> prompt field.  From what I've seen to date, most transports go with
> what you all have implemented, not with what the XEP states.  =)  I
> actually adjusted PyICQt and PyAIMt to send both the  result in the
> prompt field and the jid field, so it both follows the XEP, and also
> follows what Psi expects.  =)
>
> No biggie though, again, great work folk!  Psi has always been -the-
> client I use for "real work" (development testing, kind of the
> defacto 'if it works with psi, it's done right', kind of thing  ;)  ).
>
> Daniel
>
>> On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 04:48, Remko Troncon wrote:
>>> If anyone still has patches he/she feels they should be included
>>> in 0.11,
>>> please poke me (either on the list or via IM).
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> psi-devel mailing list
> psi-devel at lists.affinix.com
> http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affinix.com